Tim Barklow has taken a first stab at listing the processes that we'll need to fully simulate and a guess at numbers of events. No cuts have been applied (that I'm aware of) yet. That will be part of the strategy of future runs.
Our current plan is to do timing tests on each process and then try to generate an 'adequate' amount of each for evaluation in early February. Then we can decide what to keep running up until mid-April.
Here is a table Tim prepared, augmented with the selectron task at Colorado and my recollection of what each site signed up for. The general 'background' and 'two-gamma' lists are daunting as presented! As Uriel suggests, cuts will need to be applied to handle this.
FileName | process | # events | Equiv Lum (fb-1) | Where |
runpyb_ee_500_15jan1999 | e+e- --> e+e- | 205400 | 1 | SLAC |
runpyb_eez_500_15jan1999 | e+e- --> e+e-Z | 44540 | 10 | SLAC |
runpyb_enuw_500_15jan1999 | e+e- --> e nu W | 52200 | 10 | SLAC |
runpyb_gamgam_500_15jan1999 | e+e- --> gamma gamma | 4157 | 1 | SLAC |
runpyb_gamz_500_15jan1999 | e+e- --> gamma Z | 26620 | 10 | SLAC |
runpyb_mutau_500_15jan1999 | e+e- --> mu+mu-, tau+tau- | 20800 | 10 | SLAC |
runpyb_tt_500_15jan1999 | ttbar | 5540 | 10 | Michigan |
runpyb_udscb_500_15jan1999 | e+e- --> qqbar, q=udscb | 100100 | 10 | SLAC |
runpyb_ww_left_500_15jan1999 | e+ e-(L) --> W+W-, 100% e- pol | 156740 | 10 | Penn |
runpyb_ww_right_500_15jan1999 | e+ e-(R) --> W+W-, 100% e- pol | 746 | 10 | Penn |
runpyb_zz_500_15jan1999 | e+ e- --> ZZ | 5392 | 10 | Penn |
runbbh_ee_500_15jan1999 | gam gam --> e+e- | 2435950 | 0.1 | Vanderbilt |
runbbh_hadron_500_15jan1999 | gam gam --> hadrons | 13389600 | 0.1 | Vanderbilt |
runbbh_mumu_500_15jan1999 | gam gam --> mu+mu- | 2435950 | 0.1 | Vanderbilt |
runbbh_tautau_500_15jan1999 | gam gam --> tau+tau- | 189098 | 0.1 | Vanderbilt |
N/A (IsaJet) | e+e- --> selectrons | ~10000 | 10 | Colorado |
R.Dubois Last Modified: 01/13/04 12:49